High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 03 DEL CK 4181

Promila Anand vs Guru Nanak Public School & Anr.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 27 March 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tushar Rao Gedela, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 419/2024 & CM APPL. 1911/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 260 words

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. (ORAL)

CM APPL. 18422/2024 (for exemption)

1.

This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of writ of certiorari, to quash the impugned suspension order dated 14.10.2023 bearing SO No. 003/2023 issued by respondent no.1/School.

2.

Mr. Benipal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that in the present case, serious charges of embezzlement of funds to the extent of Rs. 2 crores is made for which the reply has been filed by the petitioner and disciplinary proceedings are pending.

3.

Ms. Kaushik, learned counsel submits that in the present petition, the DOE has given a dissenting note stating that no such material evidence has been found on record to show that there is an embezzlement, though it could be an irregularity of expenditure.

4.

Be that as it may.

5.

Since on merits, the suspension order dated 14.10.2023 bearing SO No. 003/2023 also suffers from the vice of non-compliance of sub-section (3) and (4) of Section 8 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973, the judgement dated 27.03.2024 passed in W.P.(C) 406/2024 captioned Rubinder Kaur Vs. Guru Nanak Public School & Anr., would also be applicable to the present case, and as such, the impugned order of suspension dated 14.10.2023 vide SO No. 003/2023 cannot withstand the scrutiny of law and the same is set aside. Consequent to the above, the petitioner would be entitled to all the benefits which will flow logically.

6.

In view of the above, the petition, alongwith the pending application, is disposed of.