High CourtsFull Bench(1939) 08 CAL CK 0007

Profulla Chandra Gangopadhaya vs Raj Mohan Das

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 3 August 1939 · Citation: AIR 1940 Cal 81

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rau, J · Nasim Ali, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 230 words

Nasim Ali, J.—An occupancy holding was sold in execution of a decree on 9th April 1938. Notice of this transfer was served upon the petitioner on 12th August 1938. The Bengal Tenancy (Amendment) Act of 1938 by which Section 26-P was amended came into operation on 1st August 1938. The petitioner filed an application for preemption u/s 26-F on 22nd September 1938. The learned Munsif before whom this application was filed has come to the conclusion that as the machinery for enforcing the right of pre-emption has already been taken away by the amending Act which came into operation before the application for pre-emption was filed, he had no jurisdiction to entertain that application. He accordingly rejected the application. Hence this Rule was obtained by the petitioner. It is clear that Section 26-F which has now been amended provided also for a procedure according to which the right of preemption had to be exercised. That procedure has now been abrogated. The Munsif, therefore, could not entertain the application for pre-emption under that procedure. The question as to whether after the amendment of Section 26-F the right of pre-emption still survives and can be enforced by a suit in the ordinary Civil Court is a matter on which we express no opinion. The rule is accordingly discharged, but there will be no order as to costs.

Rau, J.

2.

I agree.