Tribunals and Commissions(1997) 11 NCDRC CK 0013

PRINCIPAL, SAINT XAVIER'S HIGH SCHOOL vs SUNIL DUTT SHARMA

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission · Decided on 3 November 1997 · Citation: 1997 3 CPR 527 : 1998 1 CLT 526 : 1998 1 CPC 165 : 1998 1 CPJ 229

HON’BLE JUDGES
J.B.Garg , Sada Nand J.
RESULT
Appeal allowed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 303 words
1.

SHRI Sunil Dutt Sharma got his son Chirag admitted in KG Class of Saint Xavier''s High School, Sector 42, Chandigarh in April, 1996. He deposited a sum of Rs. 5.000/- on 3.4.1996 as required. Chirag had casual chicken pox in middle of May, 1996. Thereafter the School closed for summer vacations. SHRI Sunil Dutt, however, withdrew Chirag from the School. He claimed the refund of Rs. 5,000/- together with interest @ 18% p.a. The District Forum ordered on 17.2.1997 the refund of Rs. 4,500/- and also ordered payment of interest @ 18% p.a. from the date of order till realisation. Aggrieved against it, the present appeal has been preferred.

2.

THE letter withdrawing Chirag was written by Shri Sunil Dutt Sharma on 22.6.1996 during the summer vacations. It shall be useful to reproduce the letter dated 22.6.1996 which is as under : "To THE Principal, St. Xavier''s High School, Chandigarh. Sir, With due respect I would like to bring into your kind notice that due to some unavoidable circumstances, I am unable to continue the study of my son Master Chirag of KG-B (Roll No. 8310) in your school. You are, therefore, requested to refund the caution money as well as admissible fee after necessary deduction as per rules and oblige. Thanking you, Sincerely Yours, Sd/ (Sunil Dutt Sharma) H. No. 1417-A, Dated : 22.6.1996 Sector 37-B, Chandigarh."

A perusal of this letter shows that Shri Sunil Dutt Sharma withdrew his son on account of his own choice and not that there was any deficiency on the part of the School. When there was no deficiency on the part of respondent, the jurisdiction of the Forum to intervene and order a refund is doubtful. The conclusion is that the appeal is accepted and the impugned order is set aside. Appeal allowed. ____________