High CourtsDivision Bench(2023) 02 OHC CK 0122

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan, Ainthapali, Sambalpur vs M/s. Ravi Metallics Ltd., Rourkela RESPONDENT

Orissa High Court · Decided on 15 February 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. S. Muralidhar, CJ · M.S.Raman, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No. 82 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 252 words
1.

This appeal by the Revenue challenges an order dated 30th May, 2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack (ITAT) allowing ITA No.34/CTK/2021 filed by the Respondent-Assessee challenging an order dated 29th March, 2019 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT), Sambalpur under Section 263 of the Income Tax, 1961 (Act) for the Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15.

2.

This Court has heard the submissions of the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Appellant-Revenue.

3.

The ITAT has in the impugned order noted that notice was issued under Section 263 of the Act to the Assessee only on 1st March, 2019. For filing a reply to the notice, the Assesse had sought time till 29th March, 2019 to produce bills to substantiate the Assessee’s pleas. However, the PCIT appears to have passed the aforementioned order on that date itself i.e., 29th March, 2019 without referring to the bills sought to be produced by the Assessee. The ITAT has correctly noticed that the additions proposed to the PCIT and the issues raised by him “has not resulted into any addition in the assessment”, the observation of the ITAT that even if the PCIT had undertaken a cursory verification of the details produced, the PCIT himself would have dropped the proceedings, appears to be correct.

4.

The Court is unable to find any substantial question of law arising from the impugned order of the ITAT that requires to be considered by this Court. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

……………………………..