High CourtsDivision Bench(2018) 04 CHH CK 0022

Principal Commissioner C.C.E. Raipur vs M/S Steel Authority Of India Ltd Bhilai Steel Plant

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 4 April 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J · RAM PRASANNA SHARMA, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
TAXC No. 16 of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 385 words
1.

Challenge in this appeal preferred by the Revenue is to the order dated 07.08.2017 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate

Tribunal (henceforth, 'the Tribunal') which has allowed the appeal preferred by the respondent holding that Welding Electrodes is capital goods on

which the assessee is entitled to avail CENVAT Credit.

2.

It is not disputed before us that in Ambuja Cements Eastern Ltd. v Commissioner of C.Ex., Raipur reported in 2010 (256) ELT 690 (Chhattisgarh),

the coordinate Bench of this Court has held that CENVAT Credit is admissible in respect of the above stated items as they fall within 'inputs'. It is

also not disputed that Judgment of this Court in the matter of Ambuja Cements Eastern Ltd. (supra) has been assailed before the Supreme court in

SLP Civil No. 021539-021540/2011 and SLP(C)...CC No.012234-012235/2011 which is still pending before the Supreme court and further that on the

basis of order passed in Ambuja Cements Eastern Ltd. (supra), a bunch of tax appeals have been dismissed on the same reasoning vide order dated

13.09.2017 in Tax Case No.59 of 2011 (M/s Vandana Global Limited v Commissioner, Central Excise and Customs) and other connected matters.

3.

Shri Maneesh Sharma, learned counsel would submit that in M/s Vandana Global Ltd. (supra) or Ambuja Cements Eastern Ltd. (supra), the issue

as to whether Welding Electrode is also an input has not been considered in M/s Vandana Global Ltd. (supra), therefore, the issue is open for

consideration before this Court.

4.

Shri Sandeep Dubey, learned counsel for the respondent would submit that in Ambuja Cements Eastern Ltd. (supra), the capital goods in form of

Welding Electrode was considered to be input because manufacture of equipments and erection of plant/factory and supporting structures is not

possible without use of Welding Electrodes.

5.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are not able to persuade ourselves to take any different view of the matter than the one which has

been taken by this Court in the matter of Ambuja Cements Eastern Ltd. (supra) where Welding Electrode has already been considered to be input for

allowing CENVAT Credit.

6.

In the result, this appeal deserves to be and is hereby dismissed on the same reasoning on which Ambuja Cements Eastern Ltd. (supra) has been

decided by this Court.