High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 08 SHI CK 0298

Prem Singh vs Yunus And Another

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 21 August 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Sharma, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
COPCT No. 1121 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 291 words

Sandeep Sharma, J

1.

By way of the instant contempt petition, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner for initiation of contempt proceedings against the

respondents for having willfully and intentionally disobeyed the directions contained in the judgment dated 18.12.2019, passed by a Co-ordinate Bench

of this Court in CWP No.1517 of 2019, whereby direction came to be issued to the respondent-Himachal Road Transport Corporation to consider the

case of the petitioner for conversion into contract basis post completion of five years continuous service on Piece Meal basis w.e.f. 27.09.2013

onwards within a period of four weeks.

2.

Since no action, whatsoever, came to be initiated at the behest of the respondents towards implementation of the aforesaid judgment, petitioner has

been compelled to approach this Court in the instant proceedings.

3.

Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, representing the respondents while accepting notice on behalf of the respondents contended that though he has every

reason to believe and presume that by now aforesaid judgment alleged to have been violated, must have been complied with, but if not, same would be

implemented positively within a period of two weeks from today.

4.

Consequently, in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, this Court sees no reason to keep the present petition alive

and as such, same is accordingly disposed of with the direction to the respondents to do the needful within a period of two weeks, if not already done,

failing which, they would further aggravate the contempt. Petitioner is at liberty to get the present proceedings revived in case aforesaid

order/judgment is not complied with, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law is taken against erring official. Notices issued to the

respondents are hereby discharged accordingly.