Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2025) 12 ITAT CK 4743

Praveen Tayal vs DCIT

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'G': New Delhi · Decided on 18 December 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member · Manish Agarwal, Accountant Member
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
ITA Nos.2074 & 2075/Del/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 232 words

PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM:

Both the captioned appeals are filed by the assessee against the common orders passed by Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 03, Gurgoan [CIT(A) in short] dated 31.01.2025 for Assessment Years 2017-18 and 2018-19 confirming the levy of penalty u/s 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

2.

Heard the parties. On perusal of records, we find that the quantum appeals for the captioned Assessment Years i.e. AY 2017-18 and 2018-19 are decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of ITAT, Delhi by a common order in ITA Nos.1924 to 1928/Del/2025 for AY 2013-14, AY 2016-17 to AY 2019-20 respectively wherein the coordinate bench has quashed the assessment orders passed u/s 153A r.w.s. 144 of the Act on the ground of validity of the approval granted u/s 153D of the Act vide order dated 15.10.2025. The present appeals before us have been filed by Assessee against the imposition of penalty u/s 270A of the Act.

3.

Since, the Co-ordinate Bench of ITAT, Delhi has already quashed the assessment orders passed u/s 153A r.w.s. 144 of the Act wherein penalty proceedings u/s 270A were initiated thus the penalty levied by the Assessing Officer has no legs to stand and therefore, the same is hereby deleted. All the grounds of appeal in both the captioned appeals are allowed.

4.

In the result, the appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed.