High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 07 DEL CK 0378

Praveen & Anr vs State (NCT Of Delhi)

Delhi High Court · Decided on 25 July 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
CASE NUMBER
BAIL APPLN.1278 OF 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 380 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

1.

Petitioners seek regular bail in FIR No.206 of 2017 under Sections 326/452/34 of the IPC at Police Station Sangam Vihar.Â

2.

Allegations in the FIR are that the complainant is related to the accused and there was some financial transactions between the parties.

The property of the complainant was mortgaged with a third party and the petitioners are alleged to have paid Rs.6.5 lakhs to the said party and

obtained the property papers. On the date of the incident a quarrel took place at the house of the complainant wherein the accused are alleged to have

come and assaulted them. The complainant and the other persons of her family sustained injuries with a sharp weapon.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the subject FIR is a cross FIR to the FIR lodged by the petitioners being FIR No.207/2017 under

Sections 323/341/34 of the IPC at Police Station Sangam Vihar. It is submitted that the quarrel took place when the petitioners demanded return of

their money. It is alleged that the petitioners and the other family members also sustained injuries. It is further contended that in the FIR lodged by the

petitioners the accused i.e. the complainant in the subject FIR and other co-accused have been granted bail. Further it is submitted that the injured in

the subject FIR have also been discharged from the hospital and the opinion of the doctor in the MLC is that the nature of injury sustained is simple.

4.

Nominal roll of the petitioners has been produced. As per the nominal roll, petitioners have already undergone 5 months and 18 days of

incarceration as on 20.07.2018.

5.

Without commenting on the merits of the case and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the petitioners

have made out a case for grant of regular bail.

Accordingly, petitioners shall be released on bail on their furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each with the one surety of the like amount.

Petitioners shall not do anything which may prejudice either the trial or the prosecution witnesses. Petitioners shall not make any endeavour to contact

the complainant or their family members.

6.

Order Dasti under the signature of the Court Master.