High CourtsDivision Bench(2021) 08 BOM CK 0025

Prashant And Others vs State Of Maharashtra And Others

Bombay High Court · Decided on 10 August 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. V. Gangapurwala, J · R. N. Laddha, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 8337, 8343, 8344, 8346, 8347, 8348, 8364, 8383, 8384, 8385, 8386, 8387, 8402, 8405 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 299 words

S. V. Gangapurwala, J

1.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of parties, taken up for final hearing at admission stage.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are appointed from Scheduled Tribe category. Their tribe claims were invalidated by the scrutiny committee. They had filed writ petitions before this Court at Nagpur. The Division Bench of this Court at Nagpur upheld the judgment of the committee under its judgment and order dated 25.01.2008, but granted protection in service. The said judgment has become final. Now, the petitioners are placed on supernumerary posts. According to the learned counsel, once the protection is granted by this Court, the same cannot be re-opened.

3.

The learned A.G.P. in respective writ petitions submit that, in view of the Government Resolution dated 21.12.2019, the employer has rightly placed the petitioners on supernumerary posts.

4.

It appears from the judgments on record that the tribe claims of the petitioners as belonging to Scheduled Tribe are invalidated by the committee. The petitioners filed writ petition before this Court at Nagpur. The invalidation of their tribe claims was upheld by the Division Bench of this Court at Nagpur, however, were granted protection in service. The said judgment has become final.

5.

This Court in its judgment and order dated 04.05.2021 in Writ Petition No. 903 of 2020 with other connected matters held that, once the protection granted by this Court has become final, such employees cannot be placed on supernumerary posts.

6.

For the reasons recorded in the judgment and order dated 04.05.2021 in Writ Petition No. 903 of 2020 with other connected writ petitions, the impugned order placing the petitioners on supernumerary posts is quashed and set aside.

7.

Rule is accordingly made absolute in above terms. No costs.