Tribunals and CommissionsFull Bench(2022) 04 NCLAT CK 0015

Pramod Kumar Sharma vs Manesh Agarwal & Ors

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 4 April 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson · Dr. Alok Srivastava, Member (T) · Shreesha Merla, Member (T)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 08 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 253 words
1.

Heard Learned Counsel for the Appellant as well as Learned Counsel for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4.

2.

This Appeal has been filed against the Order dated 09th November, 2021 passed in I.A. No. 201 of 2020. I.A. No. 201 of 2020 was filed by the Appellant seeking recovery of the amount which was withdrawn by the Suspended Directors in violation of Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Application came for consideration before the Adjudicating Authority and it was observed by the Adjudicating Authority that in the Application Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI in short) is made party as Respondent No. 3, when there is no need by the Resolution Professional to implead IBBI. The Adjudicating Authority has dropped 'IBBI' from the array of the parties and directed to pay Rs. 25,000/- for unnecessarily making the 'IBBI' as party to the proceeding.

3.

Learned Counsel for the IBBI has appeared and made submissions that he does not propose to file any Reply to the Appeal.

4.

We are of the view that the Adjudicating Authority having already dropped the IBBI from the array of the parties, there was no necessity to further issue direction imposing cost of Rs. 25,000/- on the Resolution Professional. We thus are of the view that the Impugned Order dated 09th November, 2021 in so far as it imposes cost of Rs. 25,000/- on the Appellant deserves to be deleted and is hereby deleted.

The Appeal is allowed to the above extent.