High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 08 DEL CK 0190

Pramod Gupta & Anr vs Cyber Media Research And Services Ltd & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 25 August 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
C .Hari Shankar, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Original Miscellaneous Petition (I) (COMM.) No. 277 Of 2021, Miscellaneous Application No. 10410, 10411 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 252 words

C. Hari Shankar, J

1.

This matter was heard over two days. However, today Mr. Pratap Shankar, learned Counsel for the respondents very fairly submits, on instructions, that the respondents would finalise the Qualified IPO strictly in accordance with Clause 8.1.2 of the Shareholders' Agreement, which reads as under:

"8.1.2 The terms and conditions of such Qualified Listing including the size of the issue, price of the Shares, scheme of arrangement, mode and manner of arrangement and related matters shall be as finalised by the Company with the approval of the Investors and in consultation with the merchant bankers appointed for the Qualified Listing."

2.

In my view, this submission sufficiently allays any apprehension which the petitioner may have, and as urged in the present petition.

3.

Ms. Sanjana Saddy, learned Counsel for the petitioner also submits that, if the respondents were to act strictly in accordance with Clause 8.1.2, her client's apprehensions would, for the present, stand redressed. She also prays that her claim, predicated on Clause 9.2.1 of the Shareholders' Agreement may be kept alive to be agitated in the arbitral proceedings.

4.

In view thereof, this petition is disposed of, binding the respondents to finalise the Qualified IPO, if at all, strictly in compliance with Clause 8.1.2 of the Shareholders' Agreement.

5.

All other contentions raised in this petition, including the applicability of Clause 9.2 and 9.2.1, are left open for agitation in the arbitral proceedings.

6.

This petition, alongwith pending applications, stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.