High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 08 DEL CK 0459

Pradeep Kashyap vs State & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 27 August 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Case No..4291 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 348 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1.

The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.87/2015 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, Police Station Maurya Enclave.

2.

The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. Petitioner is the husband of respondent No.2.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the disputes between the parties have been settled and the terms of settlement have been mentioned

in paragraph 6 of the petition. The parties have already been divorced by way of a decree of divorce by mutual consent, passed on 18.01.2017.

4.

As per the settlement, the respondent No.2 was to be paid a total sum of Rs.2,20,000/- in full and final settlement of all her claims. A sum of

Rs.1,40,000/- has already been paid. The balance sum of Rs.80,000/- has been paid to the respondent No.2 in Court today by way of Demand Draft

No.498035 dated 18.07.2018 drawn on Syndicate Bank.

5.

The respondent No.2 is present in person and is identified by the Investigating Officer. She submits that she has settled her disputes with the

petitioner and does not wish to press charges against the petitioner and prosecute the complaint any further.

6.

In view of the fact that the proceedings emanate out of a matrimonial discord and the parties have fully and finally settled their disputes and the

respondent No.2 has stated that she does not wish to press the complaint any further and the fact that the parties have already been divorced by way

of a decree of divorce by mutual consent, passed on 18.01.2017, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the

case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor.

It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

7.

In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.87/2015 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, Police Station Maurya Enclave and the consequent

proceedings emanating there from are quashed.

8.

Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.