Supreme CourtFull Bench(1969) 04 SC CK 0004

Postmaster General, Central Circle and Another vs Radhabai and Others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 23 April 1969 · Citation: (1969) MPLJ 950

HON’BLE JUDGES
V. Ramaswami, J · S.M. Sikri, J · R.S. Bachawat, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No''s. 761 and 762 of 1966

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 301 words

S.M. Sikri, J.—These appeals by special leave arise out of the suit filed by Radhabai and Kamla, Plaintiffs, for damages on account of the death of Nathu due to the negligence and rash driving of Shivaram, motor driver who was in the employ of the Government and working under the Postmaster General, Central Circle, Nagpur.

2.

The Additional District Judge decreed the suit awarding only a sum of Rs. 3,600/- as damages instead of about Rs. 20,000/ claimed by the Plaintiffs. Both the parties filed appeals to the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur. The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Union of India and the Postmaster General but allowed the appeal filed by the Plaintiffs and increased the damages to Rs. 9,000/- . Having obtained special leave the Union of India and the Postmaster General have filed those appeals against the judgment and decree of the High Court.

3.

The Bombay High Court held that the deceased who was driving a Riksha was killed by the negligence of Shivaram, the driver of the truck belonging to the Postal Department, on February 2, 1955, at about 11 p.m. The High Court repelled the argument of the Appellants that the Union of India was not responsible for the torts committed by its servants. The High Court further held that the Fatal Accidents Act (XII of 1855) applied to the Union of India.

4.

The Learned Counsel for the Appellants stated before us that in view of the decisions of this Court in Superintendent and Legal Remembrancer, State of West Bengal Vs. Corporation of Calcutta, and State of Rajas than v. Mst. Vidhyawati (1962) 2 S.C.R. 989 (Sup.), he was not in a position to press the appeals.

5.

In view of this statement we must dismiss the appeals with costs.