AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
M. Jaichandren, J.—Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
In view of the averments made in the affidavits filed in support of the writ petitions and in the common counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the
respondents and in view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned, this Court finds that sufficient
grounds had been made out by the petitioner for the delay in filing the appeals before the first respondent, challenging the orders passed by the
second respondent, with regard to the payment of service tax, by the petitioner.
In such circumstances, on the petitioner depositing the entire amount demanded as service tax, before the first respondent, within a period of ten
days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the first respondent is directed to take on file the appeals, dated 15.1.2011, preferred by the
petitioner against the order, dated 30.3.2010, demanding the payment of service tax, by the petitioner, and dispose of the same, on merits and in
accordance with law, within a period of six weeks thereafter, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the authorised representative of the petitioner
company.
The writ petitions are disposed of, accordingly. No costs.
