High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 03 MAD CK 0043

Popular Vehicles and Services Limited vs The Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) and The Deputy Commissioner of Service Tax IV Division Service Tax Commissionarate

Madras High Court · Decided on 17 March 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Jaichandren, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No''s. 4421 and 4422 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 214 words

M. Jaichandren, J.—Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

2.

In view of the averments made in the affidavits filed in support of the writ petitions and in the common counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the

respondents and in view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned, this Court finds that sufficient

grounds had been made out by the petitioner for the delay in filing the appeals before the first respondent, challenging the orders passed by the

second respondent, with regard to the payment of service tax, by the petitioner.

3.

In such circumstances, on the petitioner depositing the entire amount demanded as service tax, before the first respondent, within a period of ten

days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the first respondent is directed to take on file the appeals, dated 15.1.2011, preferred by the

petitioner against the order, dated 30.3.2010, demanding the payment of service tax, by the petitioner, and dispose of the same, on merits and in

accordance with law, within a period of six weeks thereafter, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the authorised representative of the petitioner

company.

The writ petitions are disposed of, accordingly. No costs.