Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2022) 12 CAT CK 0387

Pooja Nishad vs Union Of India & Ors.

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 8 December 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Om Prakash VII, Member (J) · Sanjiv Kumar, Member (A)
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 1149 of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 72 words

O R D E R

By Hon’ble Mr. Justice Om Prakash VII, Member (J)

None present for the applicant even in the revised call. Shri Pramod Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the respondents is present.

2.

Today, there is no request on behalf of the applicant’s counsel for adjournment. It appears that the applicant has lost interest in pursuing the matter. Accordingly, the OA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution. No costs.