AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
The plaintiffs sue to enforce the grant of a pattah. The District Judge on appeal has dismissed the suit on the ground that questions are raised
which can only be tried by a Civil Court. We have not been referred to any such question. The District Judge does not find that the plaintiffs are
not in law tenants of the defendant. If they are tenants they are entitled to ask for a pattah unless the exchange of pattah and muchilika has been
dispensed with. All the questions that may arise on the footing of the plaintiffs'' tenancy may be dealt with by the Revenue Court so far as may be
necessary to determine the terms of the pattah.
We must set aside the District Judge''s decrees and remand the cases to him for disposal according to law. The costs in this Court will be
provided for in the revised decree.