High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 04 RAJ CK 0041

Pintu Yadav vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 24 April 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision Petition No. 506 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 220 words

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.

Allegation against the petitioner is under Section 305 IPC. A revision petition has been filed against the order passed in an appeal under the POCSO

Act whereby custody of the child has not been handed-over to the parents.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has invited the attention of this Court to the production report of investigation to show that the juvenile was having

love relationship with the deceased girl, who committed the suicide. The recommendation has been made to handover the custody of the juvenile to the

parents and not to be kept in Child Observation Home. Learned counsel submits that report has been ignored while passing the order in appeal.

I have considered the submissions as above and perused the report.

Taking into consideration the nature of the allegations and that the petitioner is a juvenile boy, he is undergoing studies, this Court deems it appropriate

to make over the custody of the petitioner to his parents instead of keeping the petitioner â€" boy in Child Observation Home, which may be in his

interest. The parents shall submit a bond of Rs.20,000/- to the satisfaction of the concerned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board No.2, Jaipur

and take care of the juvenile.

Accordingly, the revision petition is allowed.