High Courts(1927) 11 MAD CK 0043

Pinnamraju Raghunadha Raju vs Burra Mariyamma and Another

Madras High Court · Decided on 1 November 1927 · Citation: AIR 1928 Mad 980

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 142 words
1.

We are of opinion that ''the decision of the District Munsif cannot be supported. Section 73, Madras Village Courts Act, as amended, shows that the Court is not bound to interfere even if there is an error of law unless the decree is unjust, or, in other words, if substantial justice has been done. Error of law should not be a ground for interference by the District Munsif. In the present case no plea of limitation was raised and the findings of the village Court are clear that there were dealings between the parties and that the amount claimed is due. The District Munsif''s view that the evidence disclosed that there might be question of limitation does not give him any right to interfere. We set aside the order of the District Munsif. The decree of the village Court will stand.