Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2020) 12 NCLT CK 0585

Pinakin Shah Liquidator of Brew Berry Hospitalities Pvt Ltd vs The Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Anr

National Company Law Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench · Decided on 4 December 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manorama Kumari, Member (Judicial) · Chockalingam Thirunavukkarasu, Member (Technical)
CASE NUMBER
IA 769 of 2020 in CP(IB) 107/NCLT/AHM/2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 429 words

ORDER (Through Video Conferencing)

Advocate, Ms. Kotwal is present on behalf of the applicant.

The instant application is filed under Section 33(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, with a prayer to pass directions upon respondent no.2 to defreeze A/c No. 08432090000149 held in the name of the Corporate Debtor at Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., situated at Vadodara.

It is matter of record that, the Corporate Debtor is under liquidation having sole current account in its name at Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., Vadodara Branch, wherein an amount of Rs.70,461.79 is reflected. Due to attachment of the bank account by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Vadodara, the applicant is not able to operate the bank account and, therefore, is unable to meet the regular payments to meet the liquidation expenses of the corporate debtor. In view of that filed the instant application for appropriate order/directions.

Heard learned lawyer appearing for the applicant at length.

On perusal of the record, it is found that the applicant has annexed copy of notice, issued by the office of the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Unit 44, 5th Floor, Kuber Bhavan, Kothi Compound, Raopura, Vadodara, Gujarat, under Section 44 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (GVAT Act) dated 01.09.2020. However, on receipt of the said notice, the applicant has not responded, i.e. within seven days from the date of receipt of the notice, as stipulated in the notice itself.

It is the prime duty of the liquidator to apprise the competent authority of the State Tax office, Vadodara, about the present status and give appropriate reply to the said notice. Instead of doing that, approached this Adjudicating Authority. In our opinion, it is not wise to transgress with the jurisdiction of the competent authority of State Tax, as the State Tax Authority is having ample power to take cognizance of the matter by passing any appropriate order.

Under such circumstance, the liquidator may approach before the competent authority, i.e. office of the State Tax, and get redress and / or apprise the present status of the corporate debtor company with the relevant provisions as provided in the I&B Code. It is needless to mention herein that the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax have their own Adjudicating Authority as well as Appellate Authority to adjudicate upon any matter as per law so provided by the parliament.

In view of that, the instant application is not maintainable and the liquidator is at liberty to approach before the competent authority to redress his grievance(s).

Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed, as not maintainable.