High Courts(1924) 12 MAD CK 0033

(Peyyett) Gopalam Garu vs Adusumilly Gopalakrishnayya Garu

Madras High Court · Decided on 15 December 1924 · Citation: AIR 1927 Mad 342

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 92 words
1.

Neither the District Judge nor the Official Receiver has directed his attention to the real issue, in this matter, viz., whether the insolvent''s chief means of livelihood is agriculture. It is not enough that he be an agriculturist, or that he be a trader. The point is which profession forms his chief means of livelihood.

2.

We set aside the District Judge''s order and direct him to pass a fresh order in the light of the above remarks. Fresh evidence may be given. Costs up to date will abide the result.