High CourtsFull Bench(1929) 04 MAD CK 0012

(Pedda) Kondappa vs (Ganne) Pullappa and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 30 April 1929 · Citation: AIR 1929 Mad 910

HON’BLE JUDGES
Waller, J · Pandalai, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 144 words

Waller, J.—I am inclined to take the view that the appellant has been adjudicated on an act of insolvency not relied on in the application

against him. The act of insolvency alleged in the application was the sale of the property to a person who was not a creditor. That might have been

an act of insolved. with reference to Section 53 of the Act. What, however, the Judge found was that an act of insolvency had been committed

because the appellant had preferred some of the creditors by paying them off out of the proceeds of the sale. That seems to me to be a very

different matter. The petitioning creditors did not put it forward. It was the appellant that put it forward as a defence.

2.

I would dismiss the application, allowing the appeal with costs.

Pandalai, J.

3.

I agree.