Pedda Anniah, Chinnappa Reddy and Venkatarama Reddy vs The State of Tamil Nadu

P. Sathasivam, J.—The above writ appeal has been filed against the order dated 20.01.2000 made in W.P. No. 19279 of 1992, in and by

which the learned single Judge upheld the acquisition proceedings and dismissed the writ petition.

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants as well as the Additional Government Pleader for the respondents.

The only point urged before the learned single Judge as well as before us is whether the paper publication can precede the Gazette notification.

In the case on hand, the notification u/s 4(1) of the Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as ""the Act"") was published in the

Tamil Nadu Gazette dated 26.06.1991. However, the same was published in the newspaper on 19.06.1991 and 20.06.1991. It was contended

that since the publication in the paper has to come after the publication in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette, the acquisition proceeding is

vitiated. The learned single Judge, following the judgment of the Supreme Court reported in Venkataswamappa Vs. Special Deputy Commissioner

(Revenue), , rejected the stand taken by the petitioner and dismissed the writ petition. It is not in dispute that the Supreme court has held that the

publication of notification in local newspaper earlier to the actual publication of the Gazette is merely irregular and it does not vitiate the validity of

the notification published in the Gazette. In view of the decision of the Supreme Court, in the absence of any contra decision, we have no other

option except to confirm the order of the learned single Judge. Accordingly, the writ appeal fails and the same is dismissed.