High CourtsDivision Bench(1911) 06 CAL CK 0012

Peary Lall Daw vs Banamali Dey and Another

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 21 June 1911 · Citation: 30 Ind. Cas. 862

HON’BLE JUDGES
Lawrence Jenkins, C.J · Woodroffe, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 157 words

Lawrence Jenkins, C.J.—This is an appeal from an order of. Mr. Justice Stephen u/s 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. An application was made to the learned Judge for a Rule, calling on the opposite party to show cause why an order of the Small Cause Court should not be set aside. The learned Judge refused to grant the Rule. It is from that order of refusal that the present appeal is preferred.

2.

A preliminary objection has been taken that no appeal lies. Certainly it does not lie under the Code. The only question is whether it lies under the Letters Patent. But in order that it may lie under the Letters Patent there must be a judgment.'' In my opinion, the order of which complaint is made cannot be regarded as a ''judgment.'' Therefore, I think the preliminary objection must prevail and this appeal must be dismissed with costs.

Woodroffe, J.

3.

I agree.