High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 02 MAD CK 0073

Pearl Peace Medical Mission vs The Registrar, The Tamilnadu Dr. Mgr. Medical University and The Tamil Nadu Transport Development Finance Corporation Ltd.

Madras High Court · Decided on 15 February 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vinod K. Sharma, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 27222 of 2008

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 302 words

Vinod K. Sharma, J.—The Petitioner has approached this Court, with a prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing

the first Respondent viz., the Registrar, Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR. Medical University, to return the two deposit receipts each for Rs. 5,00,000/-

(Rupees Five Lakhs only) i.e. F.D.R. dc. No. N501510 and N501511 to the Petitioner with a further prayer to direct the second Respondent viz.,

Tamil Nadu Transport Development Finance Corporation Limited, to permit the Petitioner to encash the said FDR receipts for a total sum of Rs.

10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only)with interest.

2.

The case of the Petitioner is that before approaching this Court, the Petitioner made representations to the Registrar, Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR.

Medical University on 24.05.2007 and 06.11.2007. It is the case of the Petitioner that vide letter No. N501511/TDFC/2004, dated 23.01.2008,

the Tamil Nadu Transport Development Finance Corporation Limited, wrote to the Petitioner, that the deposit with maturity could be returned, if

discharge receipt duly executed is received from the depositors, as in the absence thereof it was likely to be renewed. It was made clear that the

Petitioner would not be entitled to any interest, after the date of maturity.

3.

The case of the Petitioner is, that the first Respondent has not taking any steps to consider the representations, in spite of legal notice dated

23.04.2008.

4.

In view of the facts stated above, this writ petition is disposed off with a direction to the first Respondent to take final decision on the request

made by the Petitioner, within four weeks of the receipt of certified copy of this order. In case there is any impediment in release/return of the D.D.

Receipt, the first Respondent is directed to pass a detailed speaking order and convey to the Petitioner. No costs.