High CourtsDivision Bench(2021) 08 SHI CK 0112

Pawan Kumar vs State Of H.P

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 10 August 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J · Satyen Vaidya, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No.1742 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 168 words

Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J

1.

The petitioner is admittedly a ClassÂI officer. Therefore, the protection, otherwise available to the other sections of the employees of the State

Government in the “Comprehensive Guiding PrinciplesÂ2013†for regulating the transfer of the State Government employees, is not per se

available to ClassÂ​I post, that too to the rank of Tehsildar, which has an important function in the State Government.

2 The petitioner has been transferred from Baijnath (Kangra) to Salooni (Chamba) and is probably avoiding his transfer only because he happens to be

a Temple Officer at Baijnath.

3 It has specifically come in the reply of the respondentsÂState that the transfer of the petitioner has been effected in view of the administrative

exigency and in public interest. There is nothing on record to controvert this submission of the respondentsÂ​State.

4 Consequently, we find no merit in the instant petition and the same is accordingly dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any, leaving the

parties to bear their own costs.