High CourtsSingle Bench(2025) 12 DEL CK 2221

Pawan Dube vs Deepa Tuteja & Anr.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 24 December 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Girish Kathpalia, J
CASE NUMBER
CM(M) 1721/2025 & CM APPL. 55882/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 182 words
1.

At the outset, learned counsel for respondent no. 1, on instructions, submits that the present petition may be allowed in the interest of expeditious disposal of the suit and also in view of legal position settled in the judgment of Pragati Construction Consultants vs Union of India & Anr., 2025 SCC OnLine Del 636.

2.

Broadly speaking, it appears that the Written Statement was filed within 120 days of service of summons by the petitioner, but the Statement of Truth and the admission/denial affidavit were filed beyond 120 days of service of summons.

3.

Accordingly, with consent of both sides, the impugned order is set aside and the petition is allowed, directing the learned trial court to take the Written Statement as well as Statement of Truth and admission/denial affidavit of petitioner on record and thereafter, proceed further in accordance with law. However, for delay in filing the Written Statement and Statement of Truth, the present petitioner shall pay cost of Rs.10,000/- to the present respondent no. 1 through counsel within one week.

4.

The pending application also stands disposed of.