High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 12 UK CK 0111

Parvese Ahemad @ Chuhiya vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 18 December 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 2605 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 199 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant Parvese Ahemad @ Chuhiya is in judicial custody in FIR No. 549 of 2023, under Section 8/21/60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station Haldwani, District Nainital. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

According to the FIR, on 18.11.2023, 22 gms. Smack was allegedly recovered from the applicant.

4.

It is the case of the applicant that he is innocent; he has falsely been implicated; there was nothing recovered from the applicant; the alleged recovery is fake and foisted; the alleged recovered quantity is less than commercial; the applicant has no previous criminal history.

5.

Learned State Counsel would submit that the bail rejection order does not reveal any criminal history of the applicant.

6.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

7.

The bail application is allowed.

8.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.