High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 04 DEL CK 4281

Parijat Sarkar vs State Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 2 April 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CRL.M.C. 2574/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 400 words

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL)

CRL.M.A. 9827/2024

Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.

Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 2574/2024

1.

Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner for quashing of FIR No. 0620/2019, under Sections 498A/406/323 IPC registered at P.S.: Mehrauli and proceedings emanating therefrom.

2.

Issue notice. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for respondent No. 2 alongwith respondent No. 2 in person, appear on advance notice and accept notice.

3.

In brief, as per the case of the petitioner, marriage between petitioner and respondent No. 2 was solemnized according to Hindu rites and ceremonies on 26.11.2007. A male child was born out of the wedlock who is presently in custody of respondent No. 2. Due to temperamental differences, respondent No.2 and petitioner started living separately since 01.03.2018. Present FIR was registered at the instance of respondent No. 2 on 09.11.2019.

4.

The disputes are stated to have been amicably settled between the parties in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 06.03.2023. The marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 has been dissolved by decree of divorce by way of mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act vide judgment dated 18.01.2024.

5.

Learned APP for the State submits that in view of amicable settlement between the parties, the State has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

6.

Petitioner and respondent No. 2 are present in person and have been identified by SI Prem Kumar, PS: Mehrauli. I have interacted with the parties and they confirm that the matter has been amicably settled between them without any threat, pressure or coercion. Respondent No. 2 also states that nothing remains to be further adjudicated upon between the parties and she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

7.

Considering the facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the case pending. It would be nothing but an abuse of the process of Court. Consequently, FIR No. 0620/2019, under Sections 498A/406/323 IPC registered at P.S.: Mehrauli and the proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed.

Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

A copy of this order be forwarded to the learned Trial Court for information and compliance.