High CourtsDivision Bench(2017) 09 DEL CK 0189

Param Mitra Manav Nirman Sansthan vs Union Of India And Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 22 September 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. Ravindra Bhat, J · Sunil Gaur, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 6108 Of 2015, Civil Miscellaneous No. 11110 Of 2015

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 394 words

S. Ravindra Bhat, J

1.

The claim in this petition is for a direction that petitioner’s land bearing Khasra No.867/2 (admeasuring 2000 sq. yards), situated in the revenue

estate of village Mahipalpur, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “suit landâ€) be declared free from acquisition in terms of Section 24(2) of the

Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereafter referred to as ‘the Act of

2013â€​).

2.

In this case, notification in respect of suit land under Section 4 of the old Land Acquisition Act (of 1894) was issued on 23.01.1965. A declaration

under the old Act was issued under Section 6 on 07.12.1966. The petitioner complains that after framing of the Award on 16.09.1986, neither was

possession of the acquired lands taken over by the respondents nor compensation or any part of it was paid.

3.

The Counter affidavit of Government of NCT of Delhi , states inter alia as follows:-

“9. That as regards status of possession and compensation in respect of the subject land, it is humbly submitted that as per possession

report dated 11.02.2003, possession of Khasra No. 867/2 (3-16) has been taken. With regard to compensation amount, it is humbly

submitted that as per NakshaMuntzamin compensation amount has been sent to revenue deposit. It is further submitted that notice under

section 12(2) was also served 26/11/1986 to Sh. Khyali Ram S/o Mathura.â€​

4.

Counsel for respondent-DDA points out that a portion of suit lands to the extent of 1200 sq. yards had been taken possession of and utilized for

construction of roads.

5.

Supreme Court in Pune Municipal Corporation and. Anr. v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors., (2014) 3 SCC 183, has held that if the

acquiring body either does not pay compensation to the land owner or does not take possession within five years before coming into force of the 2013

Act, the acquisition is deemed to have lapsed.

6.

In these circumstances, the petition has to succeed. A declaration is issued to the effect that the suit lands in Khasra No.867/2 situated in the

revenue estate of village Mahipalpur, Delhi, are free from acquisition and the acquisition is deemed to have lapsed by virtue of Section 24 (2) of the

Act of 2013.

7.

The writ petition is allowed in above terms. The pending application also stand disposed of.