Supreme CourtDivision Bench(1978) 07 SC CK 0003

Pappu alias Baijnath vs State of U.P.

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 21 July 1978 · Citation: (1977) ACR 471 : AIR 1978 SC 1455(1) : AIR 1978 SC 1455 : (1978) 26 BLJR 595 : (1979) 1 SCC 130 : (1978) SCC(Cri) 571 : (1978) 10 UJ 595

HON’BLE JUDGES
R. S. Sarkaria, J · P. S. Kailasam, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 218 of 1973

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 372 words

R.S. Sarkaria, J.—The appellant Pappu alias Baijnath, Jagannath and others were tried by the Sessions Judge, Gorakhpur on various charges related to the murder of Markandey Dhar Dubey.

2.

The incident occurred in broad day-light when athletic sports were going on in the ground of Government Normal School, Gorakhpur. A large number of spectators and the District Inspector of Schools was also present. At about noon on 13-11-1968, the deceased Markandey Dubey was seen coming from the eastern side towards the race course, hotly chased by the appellant and five others. The pursuers overtook the deceased. The appellant then stabbed Markandey Dubey with a knife on the chest, as a result of which he dropped to the ground and died there and then.

3.

The trial judge found that it was the appellant Pappu who had caused the fatal injury to the deceased with a knife and convicted and sentenced the appellant u/s 302, I.P.C. to imprisonment for life. The co-accused Jagannath was also convicted and sentenced u/s 302 I.P.C. read with Section 149 I.P.C. On appeal, the High Court maintained the conviction of these two persons holding that there was no doubt that this solitary, fatal injury to the deceased was inflicted by Pappu alias Baijnath, appellant.

4.

This Court granted Special Leave to appeal under Article 136 limited to the nature of offence and sentence only.

5.

We have heard the counsel on both sides. It is clear from the testimony of Dr. Brajendra Kumar who conducted the autopsy that there was a punctured wound "1 1/2 X 1/2" cavity deep, both edges sharp and curved, both ends tapering on the left side of the chest of the deceased. On opening of the body, the Doctor found that this wound was going deep into the heart cutting the auricle and root of the aorta. In the Doctor's opinion, this injury was certainly sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death. The appellant's case does not fall under any of the exceptions in Section 300 I.P.C. He deliberately caused an injury on the most vital part of the body, which was necessarily fatal. The appellant was, there-tore, rightly convicted u/s 302 I.P.C.

6.

The appeal fails and is dismissed.