High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 08 SHI CK 0154

Pankaj Sasni vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 18 August 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajay Mohan Goel, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
CRMMO No. 245 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 413 words

Ajay Mohan Goel, J

1.

By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of FIR No. 89 of 2020,

dated 29.06.2020, registered under Sections 279 and 337 of the Indian Penal Code, at Police Chowki Chadiyar, Police Station Baijnath, District

Kangra, H.P. as well as consequential criminal proceedings, pending before the learned Trial Court on the ground that the matter stands compromised

between the complainant/victim and the accused/petitioner and as the complainant/victim is no more interested in pursuing the FIR as well as criminal

case, in the interest of justice, this petition be allowed and the FIR in question as also the subsequent criminal proceedings be quashed.

2.

Having heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, in my considered view, it is high time that the discretionary power vested in this Court under

Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not exercised for quashing of FIR which stands registered under Section 279 of the Indian Penal

Code. This I say so for the reason that this Court can take judicial notice of the fact that cases of rash and negligent driving are on the rise and

quashing of such like cases/FIRs by this Court on the ground that compromise has been arrived at between the parties is acting as a catalyst in

increase of the cases of rash and negligent driving as now the violators of law feel that such like cases can be put to an end by compromising the

same with the complainant/victim and approaching this Court for quashing of the FIRs.

3.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that in umpteen number of cases, such like FIRs have been quashed by this Court. I add to this

submission of learned Counsel by placing on record the fact that this Bench itself in many cases has quashed FIRs registered under Section 279 of the

Indian Penal Code but the Bench now realizes that may be this is not the correct course because as I have already observed hereinabove that taking

into consideration the rise in the number of cases of rash and negligent driving, the power of quashing the FIR has to be exercised extremely sparsely

and with caution and may be not in the FIRs which stand registered under Section 279 of the Indian Penal Code.

In this view of the matter, this petition is dismissed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.