High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 01 KL CK 0400

Palathra Constructions vs Government Of Kerala And Ors

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 18 January 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.V. Asha, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 28294 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 383 words

\

1.

The petitioner had participated in an e-tender invited by 2nd respondent on 09.06.2017, in connection with the budget to work for the year 2016-17

for providing BM & BC surfacing to Edamuttam-Edathiruthy road.

2.

It is stated that petitioner had remitted a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards Earnest Money Deposit in addition to tender fee of Rs.7,875/-. The

petitioner's name was published in the list of unsuccessful bidders, after the financial evaluation, in the e-tender website on 04.04.2018. It is stated that

the Earnest Money Deposit was not released to petitioner though the tender fee of a sum of Rs.7,875/-was released. Petitioner complains that even

after repeated representations, starting from Ext.P1 dated 28.06.2019 and followed by Exts.P2 and P3, the respondents have not released the EMD

due to him.

3.

Though as per Ext.P4 letter, the Superintending Engineer informed the petitioner on 28.11.2019 that there occurred some mistake in uploading, in

respect of tender fee and EMD, in the case of petitioner and therefore steps are afoot for releasing the same, no action was taken thereafter.

4.

The learned Government Pleader on instructions submits that there occurred some mistakes on the part of the respondents in the uploading. It is

admitted that petitioner should have been given the Earnest Money Deposit along with the tender fee since he was not successful. It is submitted that

the Finance Officer has been taking up the matter with the higher authorities for correcting the mistake, for a long time. It is pointed out that further

time is required for payment, since the accounting year is different.

6.

The petitioner, who should have been given the EMD back immediately, when the financial bid was announced/uploaded, is yet to get the same.

The petitioner has also prayed for a direction to respondents to pay interest for the delayed payment.

As it is seen that mistake occurred on the part of the respondents, there shall be a direction to the respondents to see that the refund of the EMD is

made to the petitioner, within a period of two weeks from today, failing which the respondents would be liable to pay interest to the petitioner at the

rate of 9% per annum for the period, from 04.04.2018 till date of payment.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.