Supreme CourtDivision Bench(1997) 07 SC CK 0018

Padmini Unni (Mrs) vs Union of India (UOI) and Another

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 24 July 1997 · Citation: (1997) 95 ELT 452 : (1998) 7 JT 616 : (1998) 9 SCC 397

HON’BLE JUDGES
J. S. Verma, C.J · B. N. Kirpal, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 6152 of 1983

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 186 words
1.

A show-cause notice dated 6-10-1977 was issued to the appellant demanding duty for the period between 6-2-1969 and 16-4-1977. The duty was imposed on the basis that the goods were to be classified as pilfer-proof caps. It is clear from the facts that the assessee manufactured merely tab seals for supply to the Indian Oil Corporation for being used for the purpose of sealing of oil drums. In view of the nature of goods, it could not be classified as pilfer-proof caps because it was only a seal and not a cap. That apart, amended Rule 9(2) introduced six months' period of limitation and for that reason, a show-cause notice could not make any demand for a period earlier than six months preceding the date of the notice.

2.

In view of the fact that the goods were not even caps, they could not be classified as pilfer-proof caps. This alone is sufficient to quash the notice dated 6-10-1977. Consequently, the appeal is allowed and the impugned judgments of the Tribunal, Central Board of Excise & Customs and Collector of Central Excise are set aside.