High CourtsDivision Bench(1969) 02 CAL CK 0009

Padma Lochan Bag vs Ashutosh Maity

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 13 February 1969 · Citation: (1971) 1 ILR (Cal) 639

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.K. Chakravarti, J · P.N. Mookerjee, J
CASE NUMBER
C.R. No. 3593 of 1963 in T.S. No. 52 of 1958

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 169 words

P.N. Mookerjee and S.K. Chakravarti, JJ.—This Rule was obtained against an order of the learned Judge dismissing the instant suit for partition for default, even though there was already an order recording that the suit had abated, and against the said order recording abatement, a Misc. Appeal is pending in this Court.

2.

We do not think that, in the above circumstances, when the above order of abatement is still in force although subjudice, the Court will have any jurisdiction of proceeding further with the suit or dismissing it for default.

3.

In the above view, we would make this Rule absolute, set aside the order complained of in this Rule, having or relegating the parties to the position as if the said order had never been made.

4.

We would, however, in the circumstances of this case and having regard to the conduct of the Plaintiffs-Petitioners direct them to pay to the contesting opposite parties, the costs of this Rule, hearing fee being assessed at two gold mohurs.