Supreme CourtDivision Bench(1997) 03 SC CK 0081

P. Sadagopan and Others vs Food Corporation of India, Zonal Officer (South Zone) Represented by its Zonal Manager and Another

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 20 March 1997 · Citation: AIR 1997 SC 2700 : (1997) AIRSCW 2668 : (1997) 4 JT 411 : (1997) 3 SCALE 390 : (1997) 4 SCC 301 : (1997) SCC(L&S) 895 : (1997) 3 SCR 138 : (1997) 3 Supreme 604 : (1997) 2 UPLBEC 1006

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. Saghir Ahmad, J · K. Ramaswamy, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 10651 of 1983

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 439 words
1.

This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court made in Writ Appeal No. 32/77 on April 26, 1982.

2.

Respondent M. Sambandan and others had filed writ petition in the High Court seeking direction for consideration their cases for promotion in terms of the executive instructions issued by the Board. The learned single Judge dismissed the petition. On appeal, the Division Bench relied upon instructions issued by the Board and held that the promotion should be in terms of the instructions issued by the Board which bind the zonal promotions. Those instructions came to be issued in exercise of Regulation 91 of the Staff Regulations. The question, therefore, is whether the view taken by the Division Bench is correct in law? Regulation 10 of the Staff Regulations, 1971 reads under:

All promotions shall be considered by a Promotion Board duly constituted for purpose and shall be regulated by the general instructions to be issued by the Corporation from time to time in regard to the field of choice of candidates, the size of the panel and validity of the penal.

3.

The Regulation provides that such of the candidates who have put in three years experience as Assistant Category I are eligible to be considered for promotion as Assistant Managers in Category II post. It is now settled legal position that executive instructions cannot be issued in derogation of the statutory Regulations. In view of the fact that the statutory Regulations require that experience of three years is a pre-condition to consideration for promotion to Category II post from Category I post, it would be obvious that any relaxation was in defeasance of the above Regulations. The Divisions Bench, therefore, was not right in upholding the power of the Board in directing relaxation of the statutory Regulations and consideration of the cases without considering the claims of all the eligible persons. Moreover, later the Board itself cancelled 1970 panel. Regulation issued for promotion of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes should also be considered. Admittedly, they were not considered. Since the claims of all the persons are not before us, we do not propose to close the matter at this end. Accordingly, we set aside the order of the Division Bench and direct the concerned authorities to determine the promotions of all the eligible persons in accordance with the statutory Regulations and pass appropriate orders within a period of six months from the date of the receipt of the order.

4.

The appeal is, accordingly, allowed. The writ petition stands dismissed subject to the above directions. No costs.