High CourtsSingle Bench(2010) 10 KL CK 0114

P. Raveendran, Assistant Registrar vs Registrar of Co-operative Societies and Account General (A and E)

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 14 October 2010

HON’BLE JUDGES
T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) . No. 9226 of 2010 (C)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 441 words

T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J.—The petitioner retired from the service on 30.11.2008 as Assistant Registrar (Audit) under the 1st respondent. The petitioner has rendered service through the Employment Exchange before entering the regular service of PSC, namely, as Junior Inspector of Co-operative Society from 21.4.1981 to 31.5.1981 and Junior Auditor from 23.9.1981 to 19.3.1984. It is the case of the petitioner that in continuation of the above service, the petitioner was selected through the PSC as Junior Auditor in the same pay scale, namely, 450-15-525-16-605-18-785. Exhibit P1 is the proceedings of the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies(Audit), Koothuparamba, wherein the provisional services rendered from 21.4.1981 to 31.5.1981 and 23.9.1981 to 19.3.1984 have been counted for sanctioning annual increment. This is followed by Exhibit P2 order, wherein also the same method was adopted.

2.

The present complaint raised by the petitioner is with regard to the non-reckoning of the period of provisional service as qualifying service for the purpose of pension. The proceedings of the Accountant General has been produced as Exhibit P6 wherein net qualifying service has been noted as 25 years.

3.

In fact, the petitioner has filed a representation as Exhibit P4 before the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, which was answered by Exhibit P5 stating that in the light of the G.O.(P) No. 2357/Fin. dt.25.11.1999, the period of provisional service is not reckonable for the purpose of pension. True copy of the same is produced as Exhibit P7. Therein, after considering various aspects, the Government has ordered thus in paragraph No. 2:

2.

Government have examined the case in detail and are pleased to clarify that the provisional service with or without break rendered by the employees upto 30-9-1994 which qualifies for earning increments in terms of Government Decision No. 2 under Rule 33 Part III, Kerala Service Rules will be reckoned as Qualifying Service for pension irrespective of dates of retirement after 20- 11-1989. The provisional service rendered on or after 1-10-1994 will not be reckoned as qualifying service for pension. The case of retirement from service during the period from 1.10.1994 to 15.12.1998 and pensioner claims already sanctioned will not be re- opened.

4.

The learned Government Pleader submitted that the Accountant General has called for the particulars from the Registrar of Co-operative Societies. Therefore, there will be a direction to the respondents herein to examine the request made by the petitioner in Exhibit P4 afresh in the light of Exhibit P7 G.O. and appropriate decision will be taken and communicated to the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.