High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 02 MAD CK 0247

P. Palanisamy vs The Regional Transport Authority, Tirupur Region, Collectorate and Smt. M. Kamalam

Madras High Court · Decided on 10 February 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Jaichandren, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 3320 of 2011 and M.P. No. 1 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 217 words

M. Jaichandren, J.—Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the Respondents.

2.

At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the first Respondent is directed to dispose of the application, dated, 08.01.2011, on merits, within a specified period.

3.

The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the Respondent has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.

4.

In view of the submissions made by the learned Counsels appearing on either side, the first Respondent is directed to dispose of the application, dated 08.01.2011, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner, as well as to the second Respondent, within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the application, dated 08.01.2011, to the first Respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.