High CourtsSingle Bench(2005) 06 MAD CK 0037

P. Dharamchand vs The Home Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 23 June 2005

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.D. Dinakaran, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 556 of 2005 and W.P.M.P. No. 654 of 2005

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 267 words

P.D. Dinakaran, J.—By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

2.

Petitioner seeks for a writ of mandamus directing the Commissioner of Police, Egmore, Chennai-8 to produce before the Court of the

Additional Sessions Judge for trial of Bomb Blasts Cases, Chennai at Poonamalee the report dated 18.12.2003 for further investigation in No.

1384/JCS/CAMP/03/ 88/ACM/COP/03 in Crime No. 1139/2001, E-1 Mylapore Police Station, Chennai-4, conducted by the 5th respondent

herein on the petitioner''s representation dated 28.7.2003 to the Home Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, the first respondent herein, dated

28.7.2003 to the Commissioner of Police, Egmore, Chennai-8, the 2nd respondent herein dated 5.8.2003, to the Deputy Commissioner of Police

Adyar Range (now at Mylapore), the 3rd respondent herein dated 12.8.2003, to the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Mylapore, the 4th

respondent herein together with all the relative documents, as per the list annexed.

3.

Heard Mr.A.Raghunathan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr.E.Sampathkumar, learned Government Advocate for the

respondents.

4.

Concededly, a criminal case is pending against the petitioner in S.C. No. 7 of 2004 on the file of the Additional Sessions Court for exclusive trial

of Bomb Blasts Cases, Chennai at Poonamalee. If that be so, it would not be proper for this Court to tinker with such criminal proceedings,

exercising power u/s 226 of Constitution of India. The petitioner has got an effective remedy under the Code of Criminal Procedure, if he has any

grievance.

5.

In the above view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Connected WPMP No. 654 of 2005 is also dismissed.