High CourtsSingle Bench(2019) 04 MAD CK 0017

P. Arunachalam vs Passport Officer & Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 1 April 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
G.R. Swaminathan, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (MD) No. 7775 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 222 words
1.

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Assistant Solicitor General appearing for the respondents.

2.

The petitioner wants the respondents to issue passport to him so as to enable him to take part in the World Cup Kabadi Tournament scheduled to be conducted from 04.04.2019 to 15.04.2019 at Melaka, Malaysia. The petitioner had already taken out a tadkal application. But then, on account of the implication of the petitioner in a criminal case, the respondents are unable to process the said application.

3.

It is seen that the petitioner is shown as an accused in S.C.No.591/2016 on the file of the Additional Sessions Court, Tenkasi, for the offences under Sections 143, 188 of IPC r/w Section 3 of TNPPDL Act. When the case is pending before the Criminal Court, it is that Court which will have to clear the petitioner's application for passport.

4.

Considering the extraordinary circumstances of this case, I direct the respondents to issue passport to the petitioner forthwith so that the petitioner can take part in the proposed Tournament. Ofcourse, the petitioner will have to fulfil all the other usual formalities. Since, the petitioner is involved in a criminal case, the respondents will have to restrict the period of validity to six months.

5.

Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed. No costs.