High CourtsSingle Bench(2000) 01 GAU CK 0016

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Mustt. Samsunessa Laskar and Others

Gauhati High Court · Decided on 3 January 2000 · Citation: (2000) 1 GLT 477

HON’BLE JUDGES
J.N. Sharma, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
M.A.F. No. 252 of 1997

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 289 words

J.N. Sarma, J.—Heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned Advocate for the Petitioner.

2.

Seen the application filed to convert this appeal to an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The prayer is allowed. This matter shall be considered as an application under Article 227 of the Constitution.

3.

The only submission made by Mr. Dutta is that for the death of a body aged about 10 years an amount of Rs. 1,58,500/- has been awarded by the Tribunal and this is absolutely exorbitant and without any reason and this is not a just compensation; but has taken the shape of a lottery or of speculation. That is not the purpose of a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. In this connection Mr. Dutta placed reliance in a judgment dated 14.2.97 in M.A. (F) No. 153/92 and 62/93 where this Court placed reliance on an earlier decision of a Division Bench Judgment reported in 1990(2) GLR 281 Sub Umart Singh Gurung and Anr. v. Shri Seva Rama Dutta and Anr. Mr. Dutta pointed out that the court must take a pragmatic view of the matter and there may be surmises and conjecture; but the amount can not be determined in an exorbitant way as has been done in this case. Accordingly this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India shall stand allowed and the Award dated 11.7.97 in M.A.C. Case No. 4/1987 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hailakandi shall stand quashed. Already the Insurance Company had paid an amount of Rs. 75,000/- alongwith the no fault liability and that shall be deemed to be the amount of compensation for the death of the boy.

4.

The application is accordingly allowed by modifying Award as indicated above.