High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 02 DEL CK 0164

Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Jyoti Bose & Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 14 February 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Najmi Waziri, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
MAC.APP. No. 75 Of 2020, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 6029 , 6030 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

26 paragraphs · 518 words

Najmi Waziri, J

1.

This appeal impugns the order dated 05.11.2019 passed by the learned MACT in MACP No. 86/18, on the ground that right of recovery was not

granted to the appellant/insurer; it is contended that the driver did not produce a driving licence showing that he was permitted to drive a commercial

vehicle. The issue has been dealt with in the impugned order as under:-

“16.1 Insurance co./R3 did not lead any evidence in this case to support its contention taken in the written statement that R1 was holding

only a private/personal driving licence to drive a LMV-NT and was thus not authorised to drive a commercial vehicle.â€​

2.

The appellant chose not to lead any evidence apropos invalidity of the driving licence. Furthermore, in terms of the dicta of the Supreme Court in

Mukund Devangan vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (2017) 14 SCC 663 t,he law stands settled that a person holding a driving licence for Light Motor

Vehicle (LMV) can drive a vehicle whose unladen weight is upto 7,500 kgs. The vehicle in the present case is a tourist taxi whose weight does not

exceed 7,500 kgs. Clearly, the licence was valid for driving of the offending vehicle.

3.

In the circumstance, the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is untenable and it being so, was rightly rejected by the learned Tribunal

for the following reason:-

“16.4 It is now a settled law that a light motor vehicle (LMV) includes transport vehicle also and a holder of LMV licence can drive all

the vehicles of the class including transport vehicles. It is a further settled law that a transport vehicle and Omnibus, the gross vehicle

weight (GVW) of either of which does not exceed 7500 Kgs would be a light motor vehicle and also motor car or tractor or a road roller,

'unladen weight' of which does not exceed 7500 kg and holder of a driving licence to drive class of 'light motor vehicle' as provided in

Section 10(2)(d) is competent to drive a transport vehicle or omnibus, the gross vehicle weight of which does not exceed 7500 Kgs or a

motor car, tractor, road roller, the 'unladen weight' of which does not exceed 7500 Kgs i.e. no separate endorsement on the licence is

required to drive a transport vehicle of light motor vehicle class as enumerated above. My views are substantiated by the judgment of

Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in case of Mukund Dewangan vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited, AIR 2017 SO 366.8 In view of said

settled law, R1 was having a valid driving licence to drive the offending vehicle.â€​

4.

This Court finds no reason to interfere with the impugned order. The appeal is without merit and is accordingly, dismissed. The pending applications

are also dismissed.

5.

The statutory amount, alongwith interest accrued thereon, be deposited into the ‘AASRA’ Fund created by this Court for the amelioration or

the conditioning and rehabilitation of burns victims.

6.

A copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the appellant under the signature of the Court Master.