High CourtsSingle Bench(2025) 08 DEL CK 1698

Om Prakash vs Satish Kumar & Ors.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 19 August 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Jain, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
CM(M) 1549/2025 & CM APPL. 50873-50874/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 167 words

CM APPL. 50874/2025 (exemption)

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

CM(M) 1549/2025 & CM APPL. 50873/2025

1.

Petitioner is defendant no. 1 before the learned Trial Court.

2.

He moved an application moved under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC. Such application has been allowed and PW2 Amit Kumar has been recalled for further cross-examination by him.

3.

However, while allowing such application, defendant no. 1 has also been burdened with cost of Rs. 40,000/- and the limited challenge in the present petition is with respect to the aforesaid cost of Rs. 40,000/-.

4.

It is contended that cost is excessive and unwarranted.

5.

Fact remains that supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India cannot be permitted to be invoked merely for the abovesaid reason and the Court would interfere only when cost seems completely unconscionable.

6.

No such situation exists herein.

7.

The present petition is accordingly dismissed.

8.

Let the cost be cleared by next date given in the suit in question.