High CourtsSingle Bench(2001) 12 MP CK 0031

Om Prakash Srivastava vs M.P.S.R.T.C. and Others

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 6 December 2001 · Citation: (2002) 92 FLR 725 : (2002) 4 LLJ 194

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.M. Sapre, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 1328 of 2001

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 175 words

A.M. Sapre, J.—Heard finally.

2.

By filing this writ petition, an ex-employee of the respondent Corporation complains and prays by writ of mandamus that he may be paid interest on the retiral dues which according to petitioner were paid to him quite late. In other words, this writ petition has been filed by the present petitioner only for claiming interest on various retiral benefits which were already paid to him but according to petitioner quite late. It is this delayed payment, which has given rise to this writ petition for claiming interest on the retiral dues.

3.

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, I am not inclined to issue a writ of mandamus against the respondents for payment of interest. A writ petition for claiming mere interest on retiral dues may not be maintainable. The remedy may he in some other Forum depending upon the nature of retiral dues and under which Act it is paid.

4.

The petition accordingly is found to be devoid of substance and is dismissed with aforesaid observations.