High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 02 OHC CK 0130

Om Prakash Barma vs Rohita Kumar Mishra

Orissa High Court · Decided on 15 February 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Biswanath Rath, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
C.M.P. No.111 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 214 words

Biswanath Rath, J

1.

This C.M.P. is filed challenging the impugned order dated 11.10.2021 passed by the learned Addl. Dist. Judge, Titilgarh in FAO No.5 of 2021.

2.

In advancing his submission Mr. Samal, learned counsel for Petitioner contended that there is no grant of injunction by the trial court, when the

Petitioner was moving ahead with the construction of the building involved herein. By the time of disposal of appeal it was almost in completing stage.

It is alleged that for this fact has not been considered by the trial Court, there is illegal disposal of the appeal by the trial court.

3.

Considering the submission made by Mr. Samal, learned counsel for Petitioner and vetting the impugned order, this Court nowhere finds, such a

submission was brought to the notice of the appellate court for considering the development taken place during pendency of the appeal. In the process,

this Court observes, if any such point is not advanced, there is no scope for consideration of not existing materials and therefore, challenge to the order

of the court below on the premises of such ground has no foundation. If the Petitioner has any other option, he may avail the same.

2.

With the above observation and direction the C.M.P. stands disposed of.

...........................................