High Courts(1999) 04 P&H CK 0023

Om Parkash vs State of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 5 April 1999 · Citation: (1999) 2 AICLR 194 : (1999) 3 RCR(Criminal) 152

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.L.Anand, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 33940-M of 1998

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 172 words

R.L. Anand, J.

1.

Heard. The petitioner was granted regular bail by the Special Judge on 4.12.98 subject to the condition that he will deposit of sum of Rs. 2 lac which will be placed in the fixed deposit by the court to be disbursed in favour of the petitioner or the complainant depending upon the ultimate decision of the criminal proceedings. This condition could not be imposed by the learned Special Judge in a petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. Imposition of such condition will tantamount to negation of the order vide which bail has been granted to the petitioner. Such an order could be justified while granting anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C. so as to protect the interest of the complainant. Resultantly, the present petition stands disposed of by saying that it will not be obligatory on the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs. 2 lacs under the orders dated 4.12.98. Bail to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Faridabad, if the petitioner has not been released on bail earlier.