High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 08 MEG CK 1347

Nripesh Kanti Mohanta vs The State of Meghalaya represented by the Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Home (Police) Department. & Ors.

Meghalaya High Court · Decided on 14 August 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Revati Mohite Dere, C.J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Crl.Petn. No. 38 of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 283 words

By this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR dated 27.03.2003 registered with the Khanapara Police Station, being Khanapara P.S. Case No. 3(3) 2003.

2.

It is not in dispute that, although the case is of 2003, charge-sheet was filed by the Police in the said case only in 2006 and that trial commenced only in 2019, inasmuch as, charge came to be framed in 2019. It also appears that the prosecution has examined one witness.

3.

Since trial has commenced and the prosecution has already examined one witness, it is not necessary to consider the prayers/reliefs sought by the petitioner. Without going into the merits of the case, since trial has commenced and the evidence of one witness has already been recorded, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the learned Sessions Judge, Ri-Bhoi District, Nongpoh to dispose of Session Case No. 6 of 2020 as expeditiously as possible, in any event, within three months from the date of receipt of this order.

4.

The said case is being expedited having regard to the fact, that the FIR in the said case was registered way back in 2003 and having regard to the fact, that an expeditious trial is the constitutional right of an accused.

5.

The aforesaid petition stands disposed of accordingly.

6.

It is made clear, that this Court has not gone into the merits of this case and as such, keep all contentions of all parties on merits open.

7.

Registry to forthwith forward a copy of this order to the learned Sessions Judge, Ri-Bhoi District, which is seized of Session Case No. 6 of 2000.

8.

All parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order.