Supreme CourtDivision Bench(1988) 03 SC CK 0013

North Eastern Railway Employees Union and Others vs IIIrd Additional District Judge, Farukhabad and Others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 9 March 1988 · Citation: AIR 1988 SC 2117 : (1988) 1 JT 604 : (1989) LabIC 44 : (1988) 2 LLJ 332

HON’BLE JUDGES
L. M. Sharma, J · A. N. Sen, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. ??? of 1988 (In S.L.P. No. 15545 of 1987)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 249 words
1.

In this SLP notice was confined to the question as to whether the direction made by the High Court designating the General Manager, North Eastern Railway as the authority to hold elections of the North Eastern Railway. Employees Union, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, should be substituted by the Registrar of Trade Unions, Uttar Pradesh. In response to the notice, the respondents have appeared and when the case was taken up, a prayer was made on behalf of respondent No. 6 General Manager, North Eastern Railway for adjournment to enable him to file a counter-affidavit. We decline the prayer as we do not see any necessity for any such affidavit by him.

2.

We have heard learned Counsel for the appellants as well as the contesting respondents Nos. 2, 3 and 4. The Registrar of Trade Unions is the authority charged with the duty of administering the provisions of the Trade Unions Act. The High Court was obviously in error in designating the General Manager, North Eastern Railway as the authority to hold elections of the Trade Union. We accordingly grant special leave, modify the direction made by the High Court and direct instead that the elections will be held under the supervision of the Registrar of Trade Unions or by an officer designated by him for that purpose. The judgment of the High Court stands modified to the extent indicated.

3.

The appeal is disposed of with no order as to costs.