High CourtsDivision Bench(2021) 01 DEL CK 0300

North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs Vikas Goel And Others

Delhi High Court · Decided on 18 January 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dhirubhai Naranbhai Patel, CJ · Jyoti Singh, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Letter Patent Appeal No. 293 Of 2020, Civil Miscellaneous No. 25388 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 371 words

D.N.Patel, CJ

Proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.

1.

Being aggrieved and feeling dissatisfied by the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 5th October, 2020 in W.P.(C)

No.7478/2020, the original respondent in the said writ petition has preferred the present appeal.

2.

We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and looked into the facts and circumstances of the case. The appellant vide order dated 29th

September, 2020 had suspended the petitioners from the meetings of the Corporation for a period of 15 days, exercising power under Section 79(3) of

the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 and this order was assailed in the writ petition.

3.

Writ petition was disposed of by the learned Single Judge vide order dated 5th October, 2020. The learned Single Judge recorded the statement of

the counsel for the appellant, on instructions, that the Meeting of the House was not scheduled to be held on 6th October, 2020 and was deferred till

15th October, 2020. Learned Single Judge observed that from the course of action proposed by the appellant herein, the right of the original petitioners

to espouse their cause before the House would remain unaffected and at best the notice of suspension would be treated as first suspension under

Section 79(2) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 and since period of 15 days would have expired by the end of the period for which the

meeting was deferred, the petition would become infructuous.

4.

From the conspectus of facts and circumstances, it is evident that the effect of the impugned order, which was in force, for 15 days, with effect

from 29th September, 2020 has come to an end by efflux of time. Hence, the issue with regard to the power of the Appellant under Section 79(3) of

the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 is only academic.

5.

This appeal is accordingly disposed of as infructuous keeping the question of the power of the appellant under Section 79(3) of the Delhi Municipal

Corporation Act, 1957 open. As and when such question arises in future in any other litigation, the same shall be decided in accordance with law,

Rules, Regulations and the facts of the said case.