High CourtsSingle Bench(2019) 07 DEL CK 0404

North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs Phool Singh And Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 31 July 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
J.R. Midha, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 5106, 5108, 5114, 5143, 5153, 5156, 5282, 5289, 5290, 5582, 5739 Of 2017, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 21844, 21856, 21925, 21998, 22014, 22391, 22408, 23412, 23904, 40821, 40822, 40823, 40824, 40941, 40944 Of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 293 words

J.R. Midha, J

1.

The petitioners have challenged the recovery certificates issued by the Deputy Labour Commissioner for the implementation of the order dated 25th September, 2014 and 17th October, 2014 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 5034/2011.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that vide judgment dated 22nd February, 2019 in L.P.A. 109/2017 titled North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Workmen Working as Malies in Horticulture Dept. MCD, the Division Bench of this Court has set aside the judgment dated 25th September, 2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 5034/2011. The Division Bench has further held that no recovery would be made from the workmen who are working in the hospital. Relevant portion of the judgment dated 22nd February, 2019 is reproduced hereunder:

"15. For the reasons stated above, we set aside the order dated 25.09.2014 passed by learned Single Judge allowing the appeal in terms of the conclusion rendered by the Tribunal. No cost.

16.

As fairly agreed, we make it clear that no recovery would be made from those workmen, who are actually working in the hospitals. However, concession will not be applicable to those, who are not working in the hospital but are working as Malis in other places."

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the writ petitions be allowed in view of the judgment of the Division Bench dated 22nd February, 2019 in L.P.A. 109/2017. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that none of the respondents in these petitions were working in the hospital.

4.

The writ petitions are allowed and the impugned recovery certificates are set aside. Pending applications are also disposed of.

5.

Copy of this judgment be given dasti to counsel for the parties under signatures of the Court Master.