High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 09 KL CK 6223

Noorudheen T K vs State Of Kerala & Anr.

High Court Of Kerala, Ernakulam · Decided on 30 September 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. Kauser Edappagath, J
CASE NUMBER
Bail Appl. No. 5306 of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 491 words

This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre-arrest bail.

2.

The applicant is the sole accused in Crime No.606/2026 of Medical College Police Station, Thrissur District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 74 and 75 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that, on 22.08.2026 at 08.30 p.m., the applicant took the defacto complainant, a woman, in a car by offering a job near Thrissur Medical College Hospital and when they reached at the gate near the Medical College Hospital ground, the applicant stopped the car and with sexual intent, grabbed her breasts, forcibly kissed on the lips of the defacto complainant inside the car and thereby outraged her modesty. The applicant thereby committed the offences.

4.

I have heard Sri.Jerry Mathew, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.Vinay V., the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the above crime. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as part of the applicant's intentional criminal acts, and if he is released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.

6.

Annexure 3 affidavit would show that the matter has been settled between the defacto complainant and the applicant. Hence, I am of the view that the custodial interrogation of the applicant seems unnecessary. For these reasons, I find this to be an appropriate case to grant pre-arrest bail to the applicant.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i)

The applicant shall be released on bail in the event of his arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.

(ii)

The applicant shall fully cooperate with the investigation, including subjecting himself to the deemed police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.

(iii)

The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv)

The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v)

The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi)

The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii)

The application, if any, for deletion/modification of bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.